Analysis of the Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting and Extending (CORE) Model to Improving the Mathematical Reasoning Ability Students

Khairini  Atiyah; Nanang Priatna

doi:10.35706/sjme.v7i2.7746

Authors

Khairini Atiyah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia , Indonesia
Nanang Priatna Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v7i2.7746

Abstract

The low of students' reasoning ability is caused by the teacher's lack of ideas in applying the learning model in the class. This study aims to conduct a literature review on the improvement in students' of senior high school on mathematical reasoning ability after got the connecting, organizing, reflecting and extending (CORE) model and to determine the advantages of the CORE model in mathematics learning in the class. The research used is a qualitative using the systematic literature review (SLR) method with a survey-based descriptive approach. The survey was conducted on secondary data, namely the results of basic research on the CORE model on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The research technique used data collection, data analysis, and drawing conclusions. The results indicate that the student's responses to the CORE learning model were positive. Based on the research criteria from 8 articles, students’ can improve the mathematical reasoning after got the connecting, organizing, reflecting and extending (CORE) model, compared to students received conventional mathematics learning and the advantages of the CORE model in the class, namely developing students' activeness in learning, training memory, developing students' reasoning power, developing reasoning mathematical skills with the stages of connecting, organizing, reflecting and extending.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Khairini Atiyah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia , Indonesia

Nanang Priatna, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia , Indonesia

References

Aliyah, U., & Mulawarman, M. (2020). Kajian Systematic Literature Review (SLR) untuk Mengidentifikasi Dampak Terorisme, Layanan Konseling dan Terapi Trauma Pada Anak-Anak. Islamic Counseling: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 4(2), 209–222.

Agustin, N. M. (2019). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran CORE and Pairs Check (CPC) Pada Materi Statistika Siswa Kelas XI MA Ma’arif Nu Jenggawah. JPM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 45–52.

Budiyanto, M. (2016). Sintaks 45 Model Pembelajaran dalam Student Centered Learning (SCL). Malang: UMM Press.

Dewi, T. M., Risnawati., & Muhandaz, R. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE) Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis berdasarkan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMA/MA. Juring (Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning), 2(4), 305-316.

Fadillah, A. (2016). Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Model CORE Melalui Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 15–24.

Fathurrahman, M. (2018). Pendekatan dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia.

Febriani, L. (2020). Perbedaan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa yang Diajar dengan Model Pembelajaran CORE (Connecting Organizing, Reflecting, Extending) dan Model Pembelajaran CRH (Course Review Horay) Di Kelas XI MAS Darul Akhirah. UIN Sumatera Utara.

Hariyanto. (2017). Penerapan Model CORE dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa. Jurnal Gammath, 2(1), 11–19.

Hasratuddin. (2015). Mengapa Harus Belajar Matematika. Medan: Perdana Publishing.

Irawan, B. P. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Journal of Mathematics Science and Education, 1(2), 1–16.

Jacob, C. (2005). Pengembangan Model CORE dalam Pembelajaran Logika dengan Pendekatan Reciprocal Teaching bagi Siswa SMA Negeri 9 Bandung dan SMA Negeri 1 Lembang. Bandung: Laporan Piloting FPMIPA UPI.

Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2020). Pengantar Analisis Meta. UPI PRESS

Karunika, A. M., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitrana, L. (2019). Profile of Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Female Students Based on Self-Efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1265(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1265/1/012008

Konita, M., Asikin, M., & Asih, T. S. N. (2019). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dalam Model Pembelajaran Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE). PRISMA,Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2(1), 611–615.

Litte, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic Review and Data Analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https//doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2017.10.012

Muizaddin, R., & Santoso, B. (2016). Model Pembelajaran CORE Sebagai Sarana dalam Meningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3470

Mullis, I.V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Result in Mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Murni, J. S. ( 2018). Analisis Penggunaan Media Sosial Smartphone oleh Siswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran Sosiologi XI IIS 1 SMAN 01 Toho. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 7(5), 1–10.

Nanmumpuni, H. P., & Listyani, E. (2017). Komparasi Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran CORE dan STAD Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Koneksi dan Penalaran Matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(6), 43–54.

Napitupulu, E. E., Suryadi, D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). Cultivating Upper Secondary Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Attitude Towards Mathematics Through Problem-Based Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education. 7(2), 61 – 71.

Ngalimun. (2017). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Putri, K. D., Sulianto, J., & Azizah, M. (2019). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v3i3.19497

Retnowati, E., & Aqiila. (2017). Efektivitas Strategi Pengelompokan Berpasangan dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Model CORE. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1, 13–23.

Rizqi, N. R., & Surya, E. (2017). An Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability In VIII Grade of Sabilina Tembung Junior High School. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education (IJARIIE), 3(2), 3527–3533.

Septya, E. G. I., Febriana, R., & Delyana, H. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Penalaran Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. LEMMA, IV(1), 27–35.

Shadiq, F. (2004). Pemecahan Masalah, Penalaran dan Komunikasi. Disampaikan pada Diklat Instruktur/Pengembangan Matematika SMA Jenjang Dasar Tanggal 6 s.d 19 Agustus 2004 di PPPG Matematika. Guru (PPPG) Matematika Yogyakarta. Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Pusat Pengembangan Penataran Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal.

Sukirwan. (2008). Kegiatan Pembelajaran Eksploratif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Koneksi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Utari, K., Nuraina., & Fonna, M. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE) Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Malikussaleh, 2(1), 172–180.

Utomo, S. H. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran (CORE) Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending dan (RME) Realistic Mathematics Education Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Materi Barisan dan Deret Di Kelas XI SMK S Satria Dharma Perbaungan T.P 2020/2021. UIN Sumatera Utara.

Yaniawati, R. P., Indrawan, R., & Setiawan, G. (2019). CORE Model on Improving Mathematical Communication and Connection, Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Disposition. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 639–654.

Yusdiana, B. I., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMA Pada Materi Limit Fungsi. JPMI: Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(3), 409–414.