Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Bantuan Beasiswa SEHATI di Yayasan Senyum Kita dengan Metode DEMATEL dan F-AHP

Aenun Syahruni; V. Reza Bayu  Kurniawan; Syamsul  Ma’arif

doi:10.35261/gijtsi.v5i01.11386

Authors

Aenun Syahruni Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
V. Reza Bayu Kurniawan Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
Syamsul Ma’arif Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35261/gijtsi.v5i01.11386

Abstract

The decision-making process for selecting recipients of the SEHATI Scholarship by the Yayasan Senyum Kita frequently faces challenges in ensuring transparency and fairness. This study aims to enhance the decision-making system by applying the DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) and F-AHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) methods. The research involved 20 children for the 2023/2024 academic year during the odd semester, examining three main criteria: parental income (K1), orphan status (K2), and disability (K3). Results from both methods indicated that the K2 criterion dominates the selection process. The DEMATEL analysis revealed that K2 has the most significant influence on decision-making, while F-AHP confirmed this influence by assigning it the highest weight of 0.37 out of 1.00. Furthermore, both methods suggested a nearly identical number of qualified children, with DEMATEL identifying 11 and F-AHP 10. The application of DEMATEL and F-AHP successfully increased transparency and objectivity in the selection process and recommended a more systematic framework for evaluating scholarship eligibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

UU RI, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional,” Jakarta, 2003.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Selayang Pandang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Nasional Tahun 2011/2012. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Statistik Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2013.

BPS, Statistik Pendidikan 2023, vol. 12. 2023.

S. Senowarsito, A. Handayani, I. Purnamasari, dan A. Bukhori, “Studi Eksplorasi Faktor Penyebab Anak Putus Sekolah di Kabupaten Jepara,” REFLEKSI EDUKATIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, vol. 13, no. 2, hlm. 162–171, 2023.

H. Syaukat dan A. B. Susanto, “Strategies for Achieving Under School (ATS) through Smart Indonesia Programs (PIP),” Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 1, hlm. 65–88, Des 2019, doi: 10.24832/jpkp.v12i1.284.

S. Hapsari, N. A. Setiawati, N. Syifa, dan A. Munir, “Upaya Pemerataan Pendidikan Bagi Anak Yatim dan Dhuafa di SMA Terbuka,” Sosio e-Kons, vol. 14, no. 3, hlm. 309–314, Des 2022, doi: 10.30998/sosioekons.v14i3.15048.

G. J. Pramono dan T. A. Napitulu, “User Acceptance in Non-Profit Organization Applications: The Role of Intention to Use, Perceived Usefulness, and Community Commitment,” ITEJ (Information Technology Engineering Journals), vol. 7, no. 1, hlm. 53–76, Agu 2022, doi: 10.24235/itej.v7i1.94.

N. Salike dan B. Ao, “Determinants of bank’s profitability: role of poor asset quality in Asia,” China Finance Review International, vol. 8, no. 2, hlm. 216–231, Mei 2018, doi: 10.1108/CFRI-10-2016-0118.

K. Akilli dan E. I. Cetin, “Selection of Scholarship Students in Higher Education with VIKOR Method,” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 7, no. 3, hlm. 379–391, 2020, doi: 10.21449/ijate.684360.

R. T. Aldisa, A. Priyatna, F. Saidah, K. Y. Siahaan, dan M. Mesran, “Analisis Perbandingan Penerapan Metode MOORA dan SAW dalam Kelayakan Pemberian Bantuan Uang Kuliah Tunggal,” Jurnal Sistem Komputer dan Informatika (JSON), vol. 3, no. 4, hlm. 393–404, Jun 2022, doi: 10.30865/json.v3i4.4281.

B. Suprapty, L. D. Utami, dan A. B. W. Putra, “Seleksi Calon Penerima Beasiswa PT. Adimitra Baratama Nusantara Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” POSITIF : Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 5, no. 2, hlm. 55–64, Des 2019, doi: 10.31961/positif.v5i2.791.

N. Arifin dan P. H. Saputro, “Selection Index (PSI) Method in Developing a Student Scholarship Decision Support System,” International Journal of Computer and Information System (IJCIS), vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 12–16, Jan 2022, doi: 10.29040/ijcis.v3i1.55.

S. F. Azzahra, S. Bahri, dan U. Ristian, “Implementasi Metode Composite Performance Index (CPI) Dalam Penentuan Calon Penerima Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai (BPNT) (Studi Kasus: Kelurahan Tambelan Sampit),” CODING: Jurnal Komputer dan Aplikasi, vol. 11, no. 1, hlm. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.26418/coding.v11i1.57847.

E. Budiman, “Importance Weighted Ranking Methods for Preference the Covid 19 Pandemic Social Assistance,” Int J Eng Adv Technol, vol. 10, no. 1, hlm. 108–115, Okt 2020, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.A1743.1010120.

P. N. Sianipar dan H. Cipta, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Sosial Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Kelurahan Titi Kuning dengan Metode VIKOR,” Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika), vol. 8, no. 1, hlm. 18–27, 2023, doi: 10.30645/jurasik.v8i1.537.

M. Wati, B. Cahyono, dan M. B. Firdaus, “Evaluation of Poverty Society for Social Assistance Recipients using PROMETHEE Method Based on Entropy Weight,” dalam 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT), IEEE, Nov 2018, hlm. 197–202. doi: 10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878646.

M. Wati, F. Fitriani, A. Aksenta, A. Septiarini, dan N. Puspitasari, “Penerapan Metode ELECTRE pada Penentuan Prioritas Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Menggunakan Entropy Weighting dan CRITIC,” dalam Seminar Nasional CORISINDO 2022, Bali: Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis STIKOM Bali, 2022, hlm. 358–363.

A. Budak, İ. Kaya, A. Karaşan, dan M. Erdoğan, “Real-time location systems selection by using a fuzzy MCDM approach: An application in humanitarian relief logistics,” Appl Soft Comput, vol. 92, hlm. 106322, Jul 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106322.

R. Sukwadi, “PENERAPAN MODEL IS-DEMATEL DALAM ANALISIS KUALITAS LAYANAN RESTORAN SOLARIA DI JAKARTA TIMUR,” Spektrum Industri, vol. 17, no. 1, hlm. 69–78, Apr 2019, doi: 10.12928/si.v17i1.10192.

MM. Farid, E. Suhendar, “ANALISIS PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER MENGGUNAKAN METODE FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (FAHP) PADA PT XYZ,” Faktor Exacta, vol. 12, no. 4, hlm. 244–253, Dec 2019, doi: 10.30998/faktorexacta.v12i4.5025.

N. Y. Saragih dan B. Nadeak, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan JSK di Ramayana Menerapkan Metode DEMATEL dan ARAS,” Bulletin of Computer Science Research, vol. 2, no. 1, hlm. 11–17, Des 2021, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v2i1.123.

A. S. Pambudi, “Pemilihan Engineering Contractor Proyek Dana Hibah Energi Terbarukan dengan Metode Dematel dan ANP (Studi Kasus Lembaga ‘Y’),” BISMA: Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, vol. 12, no. 2, hlm. 145–157, Jun 2018, doi: 10.19184/bisma.v12i2.7878.

Y. K. Gulo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Barista dengan Menggunakan Metode DEMATEL dan WASPAS (Studi Kasus: Coffee Corner Medan),” KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer, vol. 1, no. 5, hlm. 210–217, 2021, doi: 10.30865/klik.v1i5.168.

W. N. Zai, “Perbandingan Metode Dematel dan Edas Pada Pemilihan Karyawan Kerok Terbaik,” Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 36–44, Des 2023, doi: 10.47065/jussi.v3i1.4798.

S. Setiono, K. Koosdaryani, S. Suryoto, dan N. Ulyanisa, “Selera Masyarakat dalam Menentukan Perumahan di Kabupaten Sukoharjo dengan Metode Fuzzy-AHP,” Matriks Teknik Sipil, vol. 8, no. 2, hlm. 264–272, Jun 2020, doi: 10.20961/mateksi.v8i2.44178.