Needs Analysis of ‘English for Accounting’ in Tertiary Education

Authors

  • Wulan Rahmatunisa Universitas Kuningan
  • Vina Agustiana Universitas Kuningan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35706/eltinfc.v1i2.1849

Abstract

This study focused on needs analysis and course design of English for accounting in tertiary education in Kuningan, West Java. It aimed to investigate the required learning materials and the suitable learning activities for accounting students of tertiary education. This study employed qualitative method. It was conducted in qualitative design with some data collected quantitatively through questionnaire and some collected qualitatively through interviews and document analysis from students and lecturers. The questionnaire was used for descriptive statistics, whereas interviews and document analysis were used for the collection of more in-depth and emergent data. This study revealed that listening and speaking skills are the priority in teaching English which is closely followed by writing and reading. The highest students’ preferences for classroom learning activities are vocabulary exercising, followed by simulation and grammar exercising. It is also found that most students consider English is important in their future career and they might need English to communicate with colleague and customer. This information target situation should be taken into consideration as the basis of syllabus and material development. The information from target situation analysis is important in ESP course since it is all about eliciting what the learners have to know related to their future career.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Wulan Rahmatunisa, Universitas Kuningan

Department of English Education

Vina Agustiana, Universitas Kuningan

Department of English Education


References

Al-Hamlan, S. (2013). EFL curriculum and needs analysis: An evaluative study. MA TESOL, Ministry of Higher Education, King Saud University.

Anthony, L. (1998). Preaching to cannibals: a look at academic writing in engineering. Proceedings of the Japan conference on English for specific purposes.

Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., ...Bransford, J. D., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271–312.

Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly 40(1), 133-156.

Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In R. K. Johnson (ed.). The Second Language Curriculum. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, J. D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publisher.

Frankel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: The McGraw Hill.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing Language Courses. Canada: Heinle & Heinle

Grier, A. S. (2005). Integrating needs assessment into career and technical curriculum development. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42(1), 59-66.

Hadijah, D. (2010). An analysis of materials and students’ needs in learning English: A case study at institute of higher education in Bandung (Unpublished paper). Indonesia University of Education.

Hall, S. (1996). The meaning of new times. In D. Morley & K. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London: Routledge.

Hansen, K. (1988). Rhetoric and epistemology in the social sciences: A contrast of two representative texts. In D. A. Joliffe (Ed.), Writing in academic disciplines: Advances in writing research. Norwood.

Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purpose: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krashen, S. (1984). Writing: Research, theory and applications. Beverly Hills: Laredo.

Lepetit & Cichocki. (2005). Teaching languages to future health professionals: A needs assessment study. In H. M. Long (Ed.) Second language needs analysis. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Longstreet, W. S., & Shane, H. G. (1993). Curriculum for a new millennium. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Mariana & Alfiyati. (2014). Needs analysis for developing supplementary reading materials of automotive students of vocational high school. Proceeding of the 61st international TEFLIN conference.

Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J. (2009). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.

Nation, P. (2000). Designing and improving a language course. English Teaching Forum, 38(4), 2-11

Nunan, D. (2000). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Permendikbud. (2013). No. 70 tentang kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum SMA/MAK.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today. Great Britain: Prentice Hall.

Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

Soruc, A. (2012). The role of needs analysis in language program renewal process. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) 2(1), 36-47, Retrieved from http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/

Downloads

Published

2019-05-28