Publication Ethic

The statement of scientific code of ethics is a statement of the code of ethics of all parties involved in the publication process of this scientific journal, namely managers, editors, peer reviewers, and authors/writers. This statement of the code of ethics for scientific publication is based on the Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications, which, in essence, upholds three ethical values ??in publication, namely:

  1. Neutrality, namely free from conflicts of interest in managing publications.
  2. Justice, namely granting authorship rights to those entitled as authors/writers.
  3. Honesty, namely free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publication.

Duties and Responsibilities of Editors

  • Meeting the needs of readers and authors/writers,
  • Efforts to continuously improve the quality of publications,
  • Implementing processes to ensure the quality of published writings,
  • Prioritizing freedom of opinion objectively,
  • Maintaining the integrity of the author's academic track record,
  • Submitting corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies when necessary,
  • Being responsible for the style and format of the writing, while the content and all statements in the writing are the responsibility of the author/writer,
  • Actively soliciting the opinions of authors, readers, peer reviewers, and editorial board members to improve the quality of publications,
  • Encouraging journal assessments if there are findings,
  • Supporting initiatives to reduce research and publication errors by asking authors to attach an Ethics Clearance form that the Ethics Clearance Commission has approved,
  • Supporting initiatives to educate researchers about publication ethics,
  • Reviewing the effects of publication policies on the attitudes of authors/writers and peer reviewers and improving them to increase responsibility and minimize errors,
  • Having an open mind to new opinions or views of others that may conflict with personal opinions,
  • Not defending one's own opinion, the author's, or a third party's that may result in non-objective decisions,
  • Encourage authors/writers to be able to improve their writings until they are worthy of publication.

Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers

  • Receive assignments from the editor to review written works and submit the results to the editor as material for determining the suitability of a written work for publication.
  • Reviewers may not review written works that involve themselves directly or indirectly.
  • Maintain the author's privacy by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions, and recommendations by providing criticism, suggestions, input, and recommendations
  • .Encourage authors/writers to improve their writing.
  • Review written works that have been corrected according to predetermined standards.
  • Written works are reviewed promptly according to the style of the publication environment based on scientific principles (data collection methods, author legality, conclusions, etc.).

 

Duties and Responsibilities of Authors/Writers

  • Ensure that those included in the list of authors/writers meet the criteria as authors/writers.
  • They are collectively responsible for the work and content of the article, including methods, analysis, calculations, and details.
  • State the source of resources (including funding), directly and indirectly.
  • Explain the limitations of the research.
  • Respond to comments made by peer reviewers in a professional and timely manner.
  • Inform the editor if the paper will be withdrawn.
  • Make a statement that the paper submitted for publication is original, has not been published anywhere in any language, and is not in the process of being submitted to another publisher.