COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AUTHORITY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND EGYPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v9i1.11036Abstrak
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. H
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Administrative courts, specialized judicial bodies, resolve disputes related to administrative law and government actions. State Administrative Courts in various countries, exemplified by Egypt and Indonesia, represent critical pillars of administrative justice. However, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
owever, their structures, functions, and roles differ significantly. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse and compare these courts, exploring their importance, theoretical underpinnings, and implications within legal systems .It seeks to elucidate the significance of researching State Administrative Courts, emphasizing the importance of comparative analysis between Egypt and Indonesia. It aims to examine theoretical concepts within the context of administrative courts. Egypt and Indonesia showcase distinct strengths and challenges within their administrative justice systems, providing insights for potential reforms and enhancements in administrative law mechanisms.
Keywords: Administrative laws; Indonesia and Cairo; State administrative court.
Unduhan
Referensi
"Administrative Law Review" on administrative law and court systems. "Public Administration Review" on governance, public accountability, and administrative justice.
Egypt, State Council Law, Law 47 for 1972. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/554109b8e4b0269a2d77e01d/t/554b8c3fe4b05198a8a4eb53/1431014463143/State+Council+Law-Arabic.pdf accessed 15 December 2023.
Akbar, Muhammad Kamil (2021) "PERAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK," "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI: Vol. 1, Article 16.
Egypt Justice, OVERVIEW OF EGYPT'S ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS, ALSO KNOWN AS THE STATE COUNCIL, https://egyptjustice.com/administrative-courts accessed 15 December 2023.
European Committee of The Regions, Egypt, https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/Egypt.aspx accessed 15 December 2023.
H. Salmon, Eksistensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Jurnal Sasi Vol. 16 No. 4 Bulan October – December 2010
Hauser Global Law School Program. UPDATE: An Overview of the Egyptian Legal System and Legal Research, https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Egypt1.html#_6.10._Administrative_Courts, accessed 15 December 2023
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia. No. 1, Jakarta: BPHN, 2012.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Ketua MK Paparkan Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman kepada Mahasiswa FH Universitas Riau, https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17392. Accessed 15 December 2023.
R.D.H. Koesoemahatmadja, Pengantar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1975.
S.F. Marbun, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.
T. Elbishri, La justice égyptienne entre indépendance et endiguement, Maktabet ElShorouk ElDawleya, 2006.
Egypt Justice, OVERVIEW OF EGYPT'S ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS, ALSO KNOWN AS THE STATE COUNCIL, https://egyptjustice.com/administrative-courts accessed 15 December 2023.
European Committee of The Regions, Egypt, https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/Egypt.aspx accessed 15 December 2023.
"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law" edited by Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann. "Administrative Law and Governance in Asia: Comparative Perspectives" edited by Tom Ginsburg and Albert H. Y. Chen
"Administrative Law Review" on administrative law and court systems. "Public Administration Review" on governance, public accountability, and administrative justice.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
1. Hak publikasi jurnal menjadi milik pengelola jurnal dengan sepengetahuan penulis, sedangkan hak moral publikasi menjadi milik penulis.
2. Aspek legal formal terhadap aksesibilitas publikasi jurnal mengacu pada lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonCommercial-No Derivative (CC BY-NC-ND), yang berarti bahwa publikasi dapat dimanfaatkan dengan tujuan non-komersial dan dalam bentuk aslinya (tidak dapat dimodifikasi).
3. Setiap publikasi jurnal (cetak/elektronik) bersifat open access untuk tujuan pendidikan, penelitian, dan perpustakaan. Di luar tujuan tersebut, pengelola jurnal tidak bertanggung jawab atas pelanggaran hak cipta yang dilakukan oleh pihak tertentu.
