About the Journal

Editorial Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum will check plagiarism using Grammarly®, Plagiarismcheckerx, and Crosscheck developed by iThenticate.

1. Editorial Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De'Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum does not charge fees for writers, readers, and access journal sites who want to access full-text information and download articles on journal sites.

2. Editorial Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De'Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum does not charge fees for authors submitting manuscripts or when articles are accepted (accept submission) for further editorial processes.

Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. The journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. All authors submitting their works to the journal for publication as original articles attest that the submitted works represent their authors’ contributions and have not been copied or plagiarized in whole or in part from other works. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication. The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal of Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Lembaga Kajian Hukum as the publisher of Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical behavior and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Duties of Editors

The editor of the Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

1. Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

2. Confidentiality

The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

2. Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

3. Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

4. Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

5. Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

7. Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to Mimbar Hukum is independently reviewed by at least two reviewers in the form of "double-blind review". Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. In certain cases, the editor may submit an article for review to another, third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary.

Duties of Authors

1. Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

2. Data Access and Retention

If applicable, authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

3. Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication 

An author should not in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

5. Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

6. Authorship of the Paper 

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

8. Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum the Journal of Legal Studies, published by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. The journal is the result of research and study of conceptual ideas in the field of legal science on legal issues, concepts in the level of theory and practice, court decisions, analysis of government and local government policy, and others. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum is a form of writing research results both from academic community Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang in general and the results of the authors in the Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, and active participation of other authors outside the Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. The journal is addressed to all students, the public, experts, academics, practitioners, state administrators, NGOs, and observers of the law. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum has been registered by the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI).

VISION:

“Become a Legal Scientific Journal that Has International-Standard Quality and Quantity and ASEAN National and Regional Competitiveness in 2024”

PURPOSE:

1. Building synergy both in research and service at the national level that works together between fields and between faculties to find aspects of novelty an environment in the Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang;
2. Producing research that can develop legal science and have advantages and competitiveness, attitudes of independence and high integrity and solutions to the challenges of legal dynamics by upholding morals and ethics;
3. Forming research paradigms in the field of legal science based on competency in legal skills by the development of science, technology, arts and culture, and community social dynamics;
4. Carry out the embodiment of tri dharma in the field of research that can be easily accessed by the community;
5. The realization of more intensive and extensive cooperation and partnerships with other institutions in the framework of developing sustainable capabilities and competencies for the creation of legal education for the whole community.